Launch Diablo Immortal In China, I did not pass without a trace-in just a week, the action-RPG added 10 million users.
July 23 on the account Diablo Immortal there were 20 million installations, and July 30 – 30 million. The initial release of the game took place on June 2, and it reached the Chinese market due to sudden transfer on July 25.
Recall, in the first eight weeks after the start, income from Diablo Immortal amounted to $ 100 million. The release in the Middle Kingdom should accelerate the growth of revenue.
In the foreseeable future Diablo Immortal will receive free plot content, which can improve the already good results.
30m Mortals and Plenty of Demons Slain. ?
LOG in Claim Your REWARDS. Pic.Twitter.com/pmfuxbytp3
– Diablo Immortal (@diabloimmortal) July 30, 2022
July 31, 2022 Steam Deck, Stray and Digimon Survive – three leaders in Steam sales chart
August 1, 2022 Skull & Bones does not emphasize the narrative
Diablo Immortal
The best comments
Yes, Yoma … Then do not whine that the games are a continuous casino, and in AAA games they embed
And only specifically in this case we should evaluate every hour of the game separately, or with everyone else it also rolls?
Someone clearly did not keep track of the thought of Stopheim. A shitty element of the game, in the person of aggressive monetization, they rightly fucked up, but an objectively good classic gameplay, a cheerful campaign and an abundance of content SG praised.
Really did not keep track of. Look at the end of the review again (from 14:40) and the deses, as Stopgame after criticism of aggressive monetization calmly closes the eyes on it and puts the game “commendably”, explaining this by the fact that “the campaign can be mastered without donat” and “98% of the players will not reproach the Donate grindle”.
UES says that for him https://jimmywinnercasino.uk/bonus/ personally, the game deserves “garbage” so what the hell he did not set him and began to try to justify the game, trying to pull out the assessment until “commendable”?
So then believe that Stopgame is incorruptible and independent.
Shit policy that does not cancel my claim to the assessment. Justify the insolent donat and manipulations that most people and it will not collide erroneously, t.To. it that gives the publisher the confidence that he does everything right. Where is the guarantees that Blizzard will not want to then crank a similar scheme in Diablo 4, where this will already concern us?
And I’m not even talking about ordinary people who do not sit on game sites and do not know who the publisher. Here, such a person will look at Diablo Immortal from Stopgame (where there will be no opinion of Wes that the game deserves “garbage”, t.To. it is his personal) and other presses and thinks that this is a great game and you need to try it and there will be a 2% whale that will merge all its money in this trash.
Video review assessment always coincides with the assessment on the site. With the rarest exceptions, to count on which never need. 🙂
If there are exceptions, then this is not a policy, but the recommendation, which is confirmed by different grades of text and video reviews HL Alyx, Wolken: Lords of Mayhem, Yur Grace and several other games. And in the presence of a strict policy of the same assessments of the text and video review, what happened with the evaluation of Fallout 4 would always have happened.
Now the whole press does not smooth out the corners, but are thrown onto the fan. Make an elephant from a fly.
In other words, if the game is designed for 50 hours of gameplay, then we need 50 assessments, not a final assessment?
No, people who admit me that it is surprised that
But why do some expect some kind of “honesty” from the mobile phone-I don’t understand. The essence of the mobile phone is to pull money from you and time
and quite calmly protect this.
This is already some abusive relationship. I am considered a money bag without will and calmly have a donat, but I’m glad that my owner puts his pavolo-donate dildo in me not as deeply as the rest.
Interpretations mean nothing. I installed myself played for 3 hours and deleted. I am more interested in the average online players who overcome the mark (at least 1 character) 40 lvl.
How you damn it, watched? The final assessment of the game is commendable. Yes, it is even indicated on the site under the news (and notice without mentioning that Endheim is garbage).
I quickly have questions to the leadership of Stopheim from whose permission these reviews were published.
There is no longer on the site of such a policy. For example, HL Alyx has “amazing” in a text review, and in the video – “commendable”.
How good it is that you are not a fly))
justified and defended donat and manipulation. Whales without brains but with a thick wallet can always be found.
I do not justify anyone, I say only that the system in the mobile market is built through mass donate shit. And if you participate in this, then everything suits you. Do not run into – pass by
You are so blind that I didn’t even understand that I did not play, and I do not play this donated shit at all. But this does not give me the right to call people (who liked it) with “flies” and other “adults” words
Do not confuse the main consumer of such games.
The mountain of players on my server already plays on AD3, 80th paragon, I myself play without donat quite norms, I like the Dandal of the Dandal at work, Time to pass, on BG and in search of a group, I often see characters from older serves 120 pararan. So don’t worry about this
Write about the loads, but about removal are silent? Played and deleted a month.
Clearly, there is time and effort to expose yourself in the appropriate light, but there is no forces for a cheerful review. Only on the icon.